THE REGULATORY PROCESS

Path to Permitting

National Environmental Policy Act

The NEPA Process

In early 2026, the Bureau of Land Management established a clear pathway for environmental review of the proposed DeLamar gold and silver mine under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

The process is expected to begin with the publication of a Notice of Intent (NOI) in the second quarter of 2026, followed by an approximately 15-month environmental review. The review will conclude with the release of a Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Record of Decision (ROD), anticipated in the third quarter of 2027.

Key Terms

Understanding NEPA & Permitting

Our goal is to make the federal permitting and environmental review process easier to understand by clearly outlining the agencies, approvals, and steps involved in advancing the DeLamar Project.

Click through the tabs in this section to learn more about NEPA, additional permits and approvals, and the FAST-41 permitting framework. Guided by our values of integrity, care, and innovation, we are committed to transparent communication throughout the permitting process.

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to evaluate the environmental impacts of proposed development projects such as mining operations. Through this process, agencies conduct an independent environmental review, analyze potential impacts and alternatives, and invite public comment before issuing a Record of Decision (ROD), which determines whether a project may proceed.

As part of this review, regulators will evaluate the proposed DeLamar Mine and prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). An EIS is a comprehensive review of potential environmental effects and mitigation measures. A draft EIS will be released for public review and comment before the review is finalized.

Key Terms Related to NEPA

Notice of Intent (NOI) — Formal start of the NEPA environmental review process

NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) — Federal law requiring environmental review of major projects

BLM (Bureau of Land Management) — Federal agency leading the Project review process

Scoping — Public input period to identify issues and topics for study

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) — Detailed study evaluating Project impacts and alternatives

Record of Decision (ROD) — Final federal decision on whether the Project may proceed

U.S. Department of Interior

In addition to undergoing the NEPA process, the Project must obtain 16 additional federal, state, and county permits and approvals before the Mine Plan can move forward.

Required State and Federal Permits

Final Mine Plan of Operations – Bureau of Land Management
Historic Properties Treatment Plan – Bureau of Land Management, State Historic Preservation Office
Surface Rights Lease Agreement – Idaho Department of Lands
Idaho Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Construction General Permit – Idaho Department of Environmental Quality
Section 404 General Permit – United States Army Corps of Engineers
Idaho Department of Water Resources Stream Channel Alteration Permit – Idaho Department of Lands
401 Water Quality Certification – Idaho Department of Environmental Quality
Jurisdictional Waters/Wetlands Mitigation Implementation – United States Army Corps of Engineers
Reclamation Permit – Idaho Department of Lands
Point of Compliance – Idaho Department of Environmental Quality
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/Idaho Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Industrial Stormwater Permit – Idaho Department of Environmental Quality
Dam Safety Permit – Idaho Department of Water Resources
Cyanidation Permit – Idaho Department of Environmental Quality
Air Permit to Construct – Idaho Department of Environmental Quality
Air Operations Permit – Idaho Department of Environmental Quality

In January 2026, the DeLamar Heap Leach Project was selected to be included in the United States Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council FAST-41 Transparency Projects Program. The program is a federal permitting framework designed to improve interagency coordination and increase transparency.

Established under Title 41 of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (“FAST”) Act (known as “FAST-41”) in 2015, the Permitting Council consists of the Executive Director and Deputy Secretary level representatives from 13 federal agencies as well as the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality. The Permitting Council brings federal agencies and stakeholders together to improve the permitting process for critical infrastructure projects.

Key Benefits of the FAST-41 Program

Enhanced visibility and predictability: Agencies must develop and maintain a project-specific timetable for all required federal environmental review and permitting actions. Scheduled and actual timeframes for these actions are publicly displayed.

Improved coordination: Project sponsors will be assigned a dedicated project advisor from the Permitting Council, who will monitor the advancement of the Project while maintaining active engagement and coordination across federal agencies.

Increased accountability: The Permitting Council provides oversight to ensure that federal agencies adhere to established timetables, including quarterly reports to Congress detailing agency compliance with Transparency Projects.

Federal Permitting Dashboard
Project Status

Where the DeLamar Project Stands Today

View Live Permitting Status

Currently Advancing into Permitting

The DeLamar Project has completed key studies and planning in preparation for the federal NEPA and state review, expected to begin in 2026.

This phase includes environmental analysis, agency coordination, opportunities for public input, and more.

View Expected Timeline
Shaped By Feedback

From Dialogue to Decisions at DeLamar

Since 2018, the DeLamar Project team has actively engaged with local stakeholders and tracked and incorporated feedback throughout the development process.

Input from community members, local leaders, Tribal representatives, and other stakeholders has helped inform key stages of the Project, including exploration activities, technical studies, environmental planning, and the development of the mine plan submitted to regulatory agencies.

This ongoing dialogue has played an important role in shaping Project decisions, helping to identify local priorities, address concerns, and incorporate community perspectives into Project design. We communicate updates through ongoing community engagement to share how stakeholder feedback has been considered and incorporated, reinforcing our commitment to transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement throughout the life of the Project.

  • Canyon County ATV Meeting, 2023

  • Jordan Valley Town Hall, 2024

  • Caldwell “Rugged Idaho” Outdoor Recreation Expo, 2023

  • Plan Review with Shoshone-Paiute Tribes, 2025

  • Owyhee Conservation District Site Tour, 2025

  • Integra and Shoshone-Paiute Tribes Relationship Agreement, 2025

  • Owyhee Cattlemen’s Association, 2023

  • Owyhee Cattlemen’s Association Site Tour, 2023

  • Silver City Property Owners Association Annual Meeting, 2024

  • Owyhee Cattlemen’s Association Summer Meeting, 2022

  • Shoshone-Paiute Tribes Elders Meeting, 2025

  • Marsing Chamber of Commerce Small Business Workshop, 2023

  • Jordan Valley Ranchers Plan Review, 2026

  • Rancher Field Discussion, 2022

How Stakeholder Feedback is Informing the Project

What We Heard

Roadway safety, reducing traffic impacts near homes and school bus stops, limiting dust and noise, protecting livestock movement areas, minimizing environmental impacts associated with access routes, maintaining roadway conditions, and ensuring local governments are not disproportionately burdened by increased road maintenance and infrastructure costs associated with Project-related traffic.

How We’re Responding

Community feedback and baseline study information have helped inform both current Company policies and refinements to the Mine Plan of Operations related to transportation and site access planning. For example, following stakeholder feedback related to Cow Creek Road, the Company immediately implemented operational changes restricting mine-related traffic use of the road during current ongoing site maintenance activities, including installation of signage prohibiting mine traffic along the route. The previously evaluated Cow Creek Road secondary access route was also eliminated from the Mine Plan of Operations.

Additional planning efforts include evaluation of employee busing and centralized park-and-ride strategies intended to reduce roadway traffic and improve safety near homes, school bus stops, and livestock movement areas. The Company is also working with Owyhee County to develop road maintenance and cost-sharing agreements in recognition of the County’s limited resources for roadway maintenance and infrastructure support.

In addition, the DeLamar site operations and maintenance team has demonstrated longstanding collaboration with Owyhee County on routine maintenance activities along Trout Creek Road, the Project’s sole access route. Through this partnership, DeLamar staff have served as the primary responsible party for keeping the road accessible by staff, local residents, ranchers, and recreationists. The Company will continue coordinating with local communities and agencies regarding traffic management, roadway maintenance, and transportation planning as the Project advances.

What We Heard

Protecting water quality, reducing potential for cattle and wildlife interaction with process solutions, improving the long-term stability and safety of major mine facilities, and reducing overall surface disturbance and Project footprint.

How We’re Responding

Feedback related to water quality, wildlife and livestock safety, large mine facilities, and reducing overall disturbance helped inform several refinements incorporated into the Mine Plan. These refinements included moving away from earlier conceptual Project designs that included a mill and tailings storage facility. The current Project instead proposes a smaller oxide heap leach operation with a reduced overall footprint and lower infrastructure requirements.

Earlier Project designs also proposed a single large heap leach facility with an external process pond. Following ongoing technical evaluation and incorporation of stakeholder feedback, the current design incorporates two smaller engineered heap leach facilities located closer to their associated mining areas, reducing haul distances, roadway traffic, fuel use, and overall disturbance across the site including, targeted reductions to aquatic resources impacts (streams and wetlands).

The updated design also replaces the previously proposed external process pond configuration with in-heap or underground process pond systems located beneath the heap leach facilities themselves. This approach further reduces the overall Project footprint while keeping process water contained within lined and controlled operational areas. Locating the ponds beneath the heap leach pads also substantially reduces open-water exposure to wildlife and livestock and supports additional containment and operational safety measures. Process water would remain within a closed-loop system designed to capture, contain, and continuously recirculate water within the processing system and will not be discharged to the environment. Incorporating in-heap process ponds also reduces the potential for ground movement beneath large external pond structures associated with seasonal freezing and thawing conditions, supporting long-term physical stability of the facilities.

Additional design features include lined heap leach facilities and ponds, leak detection systems, secondary containment around chemical storage and transfer infrastructure, dual-contained process pipelines, and water collection and reuse systems intended to support water quality protection and long-term operational and closure planning.

What We Heard

Reducing overall new surface disturbance, limiting the Project footprint, maximizing use of previously disturbed areas, minimizing impacts to grazing and wildlife habitat, reducing impacts to wetlands, springs, and streams.

How We’re Responding

This feedback helped inform several refinements that were incorporated into the latest Mine Plan. These updates included the complete removal of the previously proposed Henrietta Gulch Development Rock Storage Facility, splitting the heap leach facility into two separate and smaller footprints, and additional adjustments intended to reduce impacts to aquatic resources and surrounding habitat.

The updated design reduced potential stream impacts by approximately 18.9 percent and potential wetland impacts by approximately 22.1 percent compared to earlier Project configurations.

The revised layout also reduced haul distances, emissions, and dust across the site by locating heap leach facilities closer to associated mining areas, eliminating the need for approximately 60 million tons of ore from the Florida Mountain pit to travel an additional two miles across the Project area. Both heap leach facilities will be served by a single process plant, with process solution transported between facilities via a dual-containment process pipeline, further reducing roadway traffic, fuel use, dust, emissions, and operational disturbance.

Additional Project refinements included expanded use of previously disturbed mining areas where feasible, reduced power demand, updated water management infrastructure designed to minimize contact water generation and support water reuse, and continued evaluation of facility locations and layouts intended to reduce impacts.

What We Heard

Road safety concerns related to emergency response capacity, dust, cattle interactions, and traffic near homes and school bus stops. Community infrastructure interests related to increased population from mine workforce, including housing availability, local infrastructure capacity, and potential impacts to schools and public services.

How We’re Responding

The Project is evaluating a centralized park-and-ride and employee busing program intended to reduce the number of daily employee personal vehicles traveling to and from the mine site and to increase the Company’s ability to enforce policies regarding speeding and safe driving. The approach is also intended to help distribute workforce-related housing and infrastructure demand across multiple nearby communities rather than concentrating those impacts within a single area.

What We Heard

Protecting water quality, maintaining water availability for downstream users and agriculture, protecting springs and groundwater resources, and ensuring mining-related chemicals remain fully contained.

How We’re Responding

Project planning has incorporated a water management approach focused on keeping clean water separated from mining and processing areas, capturing and reusing water on site where possible, and using and recycling water efficiently to reduce overall water demand. The proposed design includes lined ponds, water collection systems, water treatment infrastructure, and reuse systems.

Water used in the ore processing system will remain within a “closed-loop” system designed to capture, contain, and continuously recirculate process water. The Project also includes multiple engineered containment and monitoring systems designed to keep cyanide and other mining-related chemicals contained within controlled processing areas. These systems include lined processing facilities, leak detection systems, secondary containment around chemical storage areas, and ongoing water quality monitoring and reporting required under state and federal permits.

Existing water quality impacts from historic mining within portions of the Jordan Creek watershed have also informed current Project planning. Ongoing monitoring, water treatment, reclamation, and long-term closure planning are intended to help address both current site conditions and future water management responsibilities as part of the permitting process.

What We Heard

Reliable winter heating resources, emergency preparedness during power outages, affordability of home heating, and supporting rural households that rely on wood-burning heat sources.

How We’re Responding

In coordination with the City of Jordan Valley, Integra entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) supporting the establishment of a community wood bank intended to provide accessible firewood resources for local households and emergency needs. Under the agreement, the Company provided funding to support development of the wood bank, which is owned and operated by the City, and committed ongoing annual support to help offset increased insurance and operational costs associated with the program.

Through the initiative, timber cleared during Project activities may be delivered to the wood bank for local processing and distribution to support residents who rely on wood-burning heat sources. The agreement also includes collaboration with nearby Tribal wood bank programs to help expand access to Project timber resources beyond Jordan Valley and to support additional rural and Tribal communities across the region.

What We Heard

Addressing historic mining impacts in the Jordan Creek watershed including, improving water quality, supporting healthy habitat for redband trout and other aquatic species, improving fish passage and stream conditions, addressing historic mercury impacts, and identifying opportunities to help restore areas affected by legacy mining practices.

How We’re Responding

In addition to incorporating modern water management and treatment systems into the proposed Project, Integra has partnered with Trout Unlimited and other stakeholders to explore opportunities to help address historic mining impacts within portions of the Jordan Creek watershed located outside of the proposed Project area. These efforts are focused on legacy impacts associated with much older historic mining activity in the region, which predate the more modern mining era that began in the late 1970s. These voluntary, “good neighbor” efforts include evaluating opportunities to improve stream conditions, support fish passage, address temperature impacts, and address mercury impacts from historic mining practices.

Integra is also exploring potential participation in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Good Samaritan Remediation of Abandoned Hardrock Mines pilot program, which was created to encourage voluntary cleanup and restoration efforts at historic abandoned mine sites without creating additional long-term liability for participating organizations. The program is intended to support improvements to water quality, aquatic habitat, and watershed conditions associated with legacy hardrock mining impacts. EPA Good Samaritan Program

What We Heard

Preserving access to public grazing lands, supporting the continuity of multi-generational ranching operations, reducing potential impacts to livestock movement and range conditions, and maintaining public access for activities such as hunting, fishing, camping, and off-road recreation.

How We’re Responding

Project planning and permitting have incorporated ongoing coordination with ranchers, grazing permittees, landowners, recreation groups, and public land users to help identify important grazing areas, livestock movement patterns, recreation access routes, and other key areas of local use and interest surrounding the Project area. This feedback has helped inform access planning, fencing and cattle safety measures, livestock movement considerations, traffic management strategies, and other design considerations intended to help maintain existing grazing and recreation uses where feasible and safe.

While some areas within the active mine footprint may require temporary access restrictions during construction and operations for regulatory compliance and public safety purposes, the current Mine Plan incorporates continued access around the broader Project area and the Company continues ongoing coordination with stakeholders and public agencies regarding access management, land use coordination, fencing plans, and phased reclamation as the Project advances through permitting.

What We Heard

Public safety, noise, vibrational impacts, and preserving the historic character and structural integrity of nearby communities and historic resources, particularly within the nearby Silver City Historic District.

How We’re Responding

Project planning is incorporating evaluation of blasting design, monitoring, and operational procedures intended to reduce vibration and noise impacts where feasible. This includes consideration of blast timing, blast sequencing, setback distances, and ongoing monitoring programs designed to measure and manage vibration levels associated with mining activities.

Feedback from local residents, historians, and stakeholders also helped identify the importance of the Silver City Historic District and nearby historic structures during Project planning. As a result, the Company is evaluating additional modeling, monitoring, and blasting notification procedures and continues coordinating with stakeholders and regulatory agencies as permitting and technical review move forward.

What We Heard

Reducing traffic during school drop-off and pick-up times, improving roadway safety for students and school buses, and minimizing congestion and traffic impacts within nearby communities during high-travel periods.

How We’re Responding

Project transportation and workforce planning continue to evaluate employee shift schedules, bussing strategies, and traffic management measures intended to reduce overlap between employee travel periods and local school transportation schedules where feasible. These considerations are being incorporated alongside broader roadway safety and community traffic planning efforts as the Project advances through permitting and operational planning.

What We Heard

Mitigation should create meaningful long-term community and environmental benefits rather than simply meeting minimum regulatory requirements. Stakeholders have also expressed interest in mitigation strategies being informed through ongoing collaboration and designed in coordination with affected communities, Tribal Nations, land users, and local organizations.

How We’re Responding

Mitigation planning will continue to evolve throughout the permitting process as potential impacts are analyzed, studied, and better understood through environmental review and technical evaluation. The Company continues working with stakeholders to help inform mitigation concepts, community investment opportunities, reclamation approaches, habitat and watershed improvement efforts, cultural resource considerations, and other initiatives intended to reflect local priorities in mitigation plans and provide meaningful long-term benefit where feasible.

What We Heard

Opportunities for meaningful Tribal participation in environmental and cultural monitoring and observation programs, incorporation of culturally important plants and traditional ecological knowledge into reclamation planning, and ongoing Tribal involvement in identifying opportunities for avoidance, minimization, and mitigation of potential impacts to culturally significant landscapes, resources, and traditional use areas. Tribal Nations have also emphasized the importance of maintaining opportunities for continued Tribal access and traditional uses of the land.

How We’re Responding

Tribal engagement and Tribal-led Indigenous Knowledge and Cultural Studies continue to help inform Project planning, environmental review, and reclamation planning. Through these studies, interested Tribal Nations are evaluating culturally significant landscapes, traditional use areas, culturally important resources, and broader traditional connections to the Project area. The studies are intended to support more informed Tribal participation throughout permitting and environmental review while helping identify opportunities for avoidance, minimization, mitigation, monitoring, reclamation planning, and long-term stewardship.

Because the studies are Indigenous-led and may include culturally sensitive information, Tribal Nations retain discretion regarding what information is shared with the Company and with regulatory agencies. This approach helps support meaningful Tribal participation in the permitting process while respecting Tribal sovereignty and protection of cultural knowledge.

Tribal Nations also participate in baseline studies and monitoring efforts, including opportunities for Tribal cultural resource monitors to participate during ground-disturbing activities and field programs. In addition, the Company conducts ongoing reviews of proposed Project designs and planning considerations through the regulatory collaboration protocols established under its Relationship Agreement with the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes.

What We Heard

Ensuring the Project does not place additional strain on small rural emergency service organizations that often operate with limited staffing, funding, equipment, and volunteer capacity.

How We’re Responding

Project planning includes ongoing coordination with local emergency response organizations, fire districts, schools, and public agencies regarding emergency preparedness, response coordination, training opportunities, and public safety planning. The Company is also developing policies intended to support and incentivize employee participation in local volunteer emergency response organizations, including approaches designed to allow employees responding to emergency calls during work hours to maintain their wages and employment standing.

In addition, the Project’s workforce development and mine rescue planning efforts are being evaluated as potential opportunities to help expand emergency response training and resources available within nearby communities. This includes exploring opportunities for shared training exercises, equipment support, and collaboration between mine emergency response personnel and local volunteer emergency service organizations. Increased regional employment and population associated with the Project may also help support growth in the local volunteer base available to rural emergency response organizations over time.

The Company has also partnered with local emergency response organizations, including the local Rangeland Fire Protection Association (RFPA), to support wildfire response capacity in the area. This has included the purchase of a specialized trailer capable of hauling heavy mine equipment for wildfire response activities, operated by trained employee equipment operators who also volunteer with the RFPA .

What We Heard

Supporting local and regional hiring opportunities, maintaining the character and values of nearby communities, reducing pressure on existing local businesses and workforce availability, and creating opportunities for long-term career growth, skills development, and investments in regional workforce training programs.

How We’re Responding

The Company is working with a locally based workforce development consultant to help evaluate workforce needs, regional labor availability, housing considerations, and long-term workforce planning opportunities associated with the Project. Workforce planning efforts also include coordination with schools, regional training programs, higher education institutions, and workforce development organizations to help support employee pipeline development, skills training, apprenticeships, and long-term career opportunities.

Project planning also incorporates phased workforce onboarding strategies intended to reduce sudden pressure on nearby communities and local infrastructure during construction and operations. In addition, the proposed centralized park-and-ride and employee transportation program is intended to help distribute workforce-related housing and infrastructure demand across multiple nearby communities rather than concentrating those impacts within a single area.

The Company also continues evaluating opportunities to prioritize regional hiring and workforce development where feasible, while supporting long-term employee retention, professional development, and advancement opportunities throughout the life of the Project.

What We Heard

Creating opportunities for local businesses, suppliers, contractors, and service providers to participate in and benefit from Project development and operations. Stakeholders have also emphasized the importance of supporting existing regional businesses and keeping Project-related economic activity within nearby communities where feasible.

How We’re Responding

The Company is working through its Project development and construction planning efforts to develop supply chain and procurement strategies intended to prioritize local and regional businesses where feasible. This includes ongoing evaluation of contracting opportunities, supplier outreach, workforce needs, and regional service capacity as Project planning advances.

The Company has also developed and continues to maintain a Supplier Interest Form to help identify local and regional businesses interested in providing goods and services related to the Project. Local contractors, vendors, service providers, and businesses are encouraged to submit information regarding their capabilities and areas of interest as part of ongoing supply chain planning and outreach efforts.
DeLamar Project Supplier Interest Form

What We Heard

Ensuring post-mining land uses continue to support grazing and agricultural practices, restoring access for recreation and public land uses where feasible and in compliance with permit requirements, incorporating culturally important plant species and Tribal perspectives into reclamation planning, and supporting long-term landscape outcomes that reflect local values and land use priorities.

How We’re Responding

Reclamation and closure planning are being developed with consideration for the Bureau of Land Management’s multiple-use mandate and the long-term goal of supporting future shared land uses following mining. This includes ongoing evaluation of reclamation approaches intended to support grazing, wildlife habitat, recreation, watershed function, and other future land uses where feasible as reclamation progresses over time.

Tribal engagement and Indigenous Knowledge studies are also helping inform reclamation planning, including evaluation of culturally important vegetation, traditional ecological knowledge, and long-term stewardship considerations associated with reclaimed landscapes. The Mine Plan also incorporates concurrent reclamation practices, allowing portions of disturbed areas to be progressively reclaimed and revegetated during operations rather than waiting until mining activities are fully complete.

The Company is also exploring potential grazing and reclamation pilot study opportunities intended to better understand how livestock grazing, vegetation establishment, rangeland health, and post-mining reclamation practices may work together to support long-term land stewardship and future grazing use following reclamation.

What We Heard

Reducing the overall energy demand of the Project and minimizing impacts associated with energy transmission infrastructure, including potential effects to private property owners, sage-grouse habitat, streams, cultural resources, and other sensitive land uses crossed by potential transmission corridors.

How We’re Responding

Earlier Project designs evaluated during the pre-feasibility stage included a larger processing configuration with three stages of crushing that would have required substantially greater power demand and a larger new transmission line to serve the Project. Through ongoing technical evaluation and stakeholder feedback, the Company reevaluated that approach and transitioned to a lower-energy design incorporating two stages of crushing in the current mine design.

While the updated design results in slightly lower projected gold and silver recoveries, it also significantly reduces projected power demand and associated transmission infrastructure needs. The revised approach helped reduce potential impacts related to new transmission corridors, including potential easements across private property, sage-grouse habitat disturbance, stream crossings, and broader surface disturbance associated with larger power infrastructure development.

What We Heard

Ensuring the Company remains responsive and accountable to nearby communities throughout operations, particularly regarding issues that may fall outside of formal environmental permitting requirements. These interests include topics such as traffic management and safety, employee and contractor conduct, respect for local culture and values, and maintaining ongoing opportunities for collaboration and problem-solving as Project activities increase over time.

How We’re Responding

In addition to participating in the formal permitting process, the Company plans to continue hosting proponent-led open houses and community meetings focused on operational topics, community concerns, and Company policies that may fall outside the scope of environmental review. The Company is also developing plans to establish a community advisory committee intended to remain active throughout the life of the mine as a consistent forum for sharing information, discussing concerns, and supporting ongoing collaboration with nearby communities and other stakeholders.

The Company is also incorporating concerns related to employee roadway safety, community conduct, and respect for local and Tribal culture and values into employee and contractor policies and training programs. This will include the development of a cultural awareness training program for employees and contractors working on the Project.

In addition, the Company has established a grievance and feedback mechanism intended to support timely communication and meaningful resolution of concerns. As Project activity increases over time, the Company recognizes it will not always get everything right, but remains committed to operating with integrity, maintaining open communication, and working collaboratively with neighboring communities to address concerns throughout the life of the Project.

What We Heard

Protecting grazing lands and rangeland health, reducing wildfire fuel loading, preventing the spread of invasive species, and ensuring the Project incorporates local and regional expertise regarding long-term weed management practices.

How We’re Responding

The Mine Plan of Operations includes a Noxious Weed Management Plan intended to support prevention, monitoring, treatment, and long-term management of invasive plant species. This plan has been developed through longstanding coordination and participation with the Jordan Valley Cooperative Weed Management Area (JVCWMA). Through the JVCWMA and other local outreach, the Company has worked alongside ranchers, land managers, and agencies to better understand regional weed management priorities and best practices.

The Noxious Weed Management Plan incorporates measures intended to reduce the spread of invasive species to and from the site, including Project design elements such as equipment cleaning protocols and an undercarriage wash system designed to help limit the transport of weed seeds by Project vehicles and equipment to and from the site. Feedback and knowledge shared through these ongoing collaborative efforts continue to help inform Project weed management and future reclamation planning, recognizing the extensive experience local ranchers and land managers bring to this topic.

Your Voice Matters!

Share your feedback and help shape the DeLamar Project!

Share Your Feedback!
Explore DeLamar

Interactive Project Tour

Click through the interactive map to explore the Project site, key features, and how the Project fits into the surrounding landscape.

Years
of Study and Planning
Invested
in Exploration, Studies, and Engineering
Community Investment
Beneficiaries from 2023-2025
Stakeholder Interactions
Since April 2021